From Krems to Linz: Reflections from EGOV 2025 and a Research Visit to Austria

September brought a truly inspiring and intense sequence of events: the EGOV 2025 from Doctoral Colloquium to Junior Faculty School, and the main IFIP EGOV 2025 conference in Krems, followed by a research stay at Johannes Kepler University Linz. Five days of discussion, mentoring, presenting, and connecting in Krems with several more in Linz where the intensive research stay was enriched by a memorable dive into the Ars Electronica Festival and its conversations on technology, fear, and democratic futures.

What follows is a reflection on an academically dense but deeply rewarding journey across two Austrian cities.

EGOV2025: Doctoral Colloquium & Junior Faculty School

We began in the breathtaking setting of Göttweig Abbey with the EGOV 2025 Doctoral Colloquium, where 13 PhD students presented their research, shared challenges of the doctoral journey, and engaged in open discussions with mentors.

The following day, the Junior Faculty School expanded these conversations to early career researchers (up to five years post-PhD). Together with a wonderfully engaged group, we explored questions about career trajectories, researcher identity, publishing strategies, gender inequalities in academia, and the importance of being in a workplace that supports—not drains—well-being.

A recurring theme across both days was impact. We examined it from multiple perspectives:

  • during the Colloquium’s mentor panel
  • in Tomasz Janowski’s keynote
  • through the “from research to policy” workshop by Paula Rodriguez Müller, Sven Schade, and Luca Tangi
  • in the panel on publishing in top journals with Panos Panagiotopoulos and Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar
  • and in roundtable discussions on career development

Sincere thanks to the organizers—Gabriela Viale Pereira, Ida Lindgren, Lieselot Danneels, J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, and Michael Koddebusch—for making these events equally enriching for participants and mentors.

EGOV 2025 conference

With the main conference underway, we launched the Emerging Technologies and Innovations track, which I co-chaired with Francesco Mureddu and Paula Rodriguez Müller. This year, we welcomed Paula (European Commission JRC) to the team and continued pushing the track beyond academic silos, aiming to strengthen the bridge between research, policy, and practice.

We were delighted to see a record number of submissions—double compared to last year. A growing Information Systems community joined us, fulfilling the long-term ambition that Marijn Janssen and I have shared for the track.

Across three sessions, we explored topics that shape the future of governance:

  • the potential of generative AI and LLMs for administrative literacy and public sector transformation
  • trust frameworks and platform governance
  • GovTech incubators and the gap between prototypes and long-term implementation
  • self-assessment tools for climate adaptation
  • digital transformation patterns in smart city strategies

These studies together illustrated how emerging technologies and governance innovation are reshaping public institutions.

A special highlight was the Best Paper Award in the category “Most Innovative Research Contribution or Case Study”, received by Lukas Daßler for “GovTech Incubators: Bridging the Gap Between Prototypes and Long-Term Implementation” (co-authored with Andreas Hein and Helmut Krcmar). Congratulations once again!

I was happy to present two papers at the conference:

  1. “Proactive Public Services in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Towards Post-Bureaucratic Governance” with Paula Rodriguez Müller, Luca Tangi, and Jaume Martin Bosch – the first (or “step 0”) output of our ongoing research on AI-enabled proactive service provision.
  2. “May the Data Be with You: Towards an AI-Powered Semantic Recommender for Unlocking Dark Data” based on the master thesis of my former student, now at Microsoft, Ramil Huseynov; co-authored with Dimitris Simeonidis and David Duenas-Cid – a project that combines technical exploration with a generous dose of nerdiness and fun.

Research Visit to Linz

Right after EGOV, I travelled to JKU Linz, hosted by Christoph Schuetz at the Institute of Business Informatics – Data & Knowledge Engineering. During the visit, I delivered an invited talk titled “Responsible Data Ecosystems: From Data Governance to AI Adoption.”
We discussed how to establish trustworthy, effective data practices while responsibly integrating AI, and explored opportunities for future collaboration.

Beyond the academic exchange, Linz offered its own inspiration: diverse, vibrant, and beautifully intertwined with nature and art such as..

Ars Electronica 2025: Panic – Yes/No?

One of the standout experiences was the Ars Electronica Festival, which this year examined the theme “Panic – Yes/No?”. The exhibitions brought together over 1,400 contributors—artists, scientists, developers, entrepreneurs, and activists—questioning our collective sense of alarm and exploring whether “collective panic” is a rational response or a product of sensationalism.

AI and its societal implications stood at the heart of many installations: Who designs these systems? For whom? According to which values? These questions resonate strongly with the core of my own research and offered a refreshing, interdisciplinary lens on technology and democratic futures.

From mentoring early-stage researchers and running a dynamic track, to presenting new work, reconnecting with colleagues, expanding the Information Systems presence within EGOV, and diving into Linz’s research and cultural landscape—it was an intense but profoundly rewarding start of the semester. Weeks like these is a food reminder of why mentoring, connecting, and building research communities matter so much—and why an early Sunday alarm can indeed be worth it.

Call for Papers: Accountable and Inclusive Digital Ecosystems for Public Value Creation — dg.o 2026

Call for Papers is now open for our track “Accountable and Inclusive Digital Ecosystems for Public Value Creation” at the 27th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2026). The conference will take place June 2–5, 2026, at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA.

This track continues and expands the work we initiated in 2024 and 2025 on public and open data ecosystems. Responding to new technological and societal realities, we broaden the focus this year toward AI-enabled, interoperable, sustainable, and human-centered digital ecosystems—their design, governance, and impact on public value creation.

Why this track? Why now?

Digital ecosystems are undergoing profound transformation. Emerging technologies—AI (including generative AI), interoperable data spaces, IoT, cloud–edge infrastructures, and new governance frameworks—now form the backbone of digital public action. These technologies unlock unprecedented opportunities for insight generation, collaboration, transparency, and service co-creation across sectors.

Yet they also introduce new challenges: ethics, accountability, trust, digital literacy, and inclusion. As governments and organizations navigate this shift, we need research that bridges technical innovation, institutional capacity, and societal expectations.

Our track provides a space for this conversation.

What the track explores

We invite contributions that examine the conceptual, technical, institutional, and societal dimensions of digital and data ecosystems, with an emphasis on accountability, sustainability, inclusivity, and public value.

Topics of interest include (but are not limited to):

  • Ethical and accountable AI, data governance, algorithmic transparency, privacy, security
  • Interoperability and trust frameworks, identity infrastructures, standards, reference architectures
  • AI, Generative AI, LLMs, NLP, IoT/cloud/edge integration, green computing, Metaverse applications
  • Human–AI interaction, explainability, accessibility, inclusion in digital public services
  • Stakeholder engagement, empowerment, co-creation, digital literacy, data sovereignty
  • Institutional and organizational mechanisms for ecosystem governance and sustainable management
  • Open, public, and cross-sector data ecosystems, including data spaces and platform ecosystems
  • Social, economic, and environmental sustainability and other public value dimensions
  • Case studies from cities, communities, public-sector organizations, and multi-stakeholder collaborations
  • Impact assessments of digital ecosystems on individuals, organizations, and society

Connection to the dg.o 2026 theme

The conference theme—Collaborative Digital Transformation for Public Value Creation—aligns perfectly with our track’s purpose.
Digital ecosystems represent socio-technical infrastructures where governance, technology, and societal needs intersect. Understanding how to make these ecosystems accountable, inclusive, and sustainable is essential for collaborative digital transformation and for delivering tangible societal outcomes.

Track chairs

  • Anastasija Nikiforova, University of Tartu (Estonia)
  • Anthony Simonofski, Université de Namur (Belgium)
  • Anneke Zuiderwijk – van Eijk, Delft University of Technology (Netherlands)
  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, Universidad de Granada (Spain)

Together, we bring perspectives from digital government, data governance, public administration, information systems, and socio-technical ecosystem design.

Submission details

Full CFP and submission guidelines are available here:
🔗 https://dgsociety.org/dgo-2026/

We look forward to receiving your submissions and to advancing the conversation on how accountable, inclusive, and sustainable digital ecosystems can drive the next generation of public value creation.

If you have questions about fit or ideas you’d like to discuss, feel free to reach out.

The Evolution of Public Data Ecosystems: Our new GIQ paper

Our new paper, “Theorizing the evolution of public data ecosystems: An empirically grounded multi-generational model and future research agenda”, has been published in Government Information Quarterly. This publication marks the conclusion of a long-running research journey—one so rich that it produced four papers along the way—and brings together years of reflection on how public data systems emerge, evolve, and transform.

Several months ago, in my invited blogpost for Data Studies (“In Open Data We Trust? Busting the Myth, Rethinking Value in the Age of GenAI”), I reflected on the promises and limitations of open data. Despite its early optimism and democratic ideals, open data has produced uneven results in practice. This tension reinforced what I had been observing for years: open data alone is no longer sufficient. Instead, what increasingly matters is the broader, more adaptive configuration of Public Data Ecosystems (PDEs)—dynamic, evolving socio-technical systems shaped by institutions, technologies, infrastructures, actors, risks, and societal needs. That earlier blogpost unexpectedly provided the final spark of motivation to bring this paper across the finish line.

Why Public Data Ecosystems?

PDEs extend far beyond traditional open government data. They include geospatial data infrastructures, IoT-driven ecosystems, domain-specific environments, and federated data spaces with varying access models (see typology of PDEs in figure below and this piece). What binds them is not openness but their co-evolution—the way actors, data types, governance models, and technologies reshape each other over time.

This has become particularly salient with the rise of AI, generative AI, and large language models. These technologies challenge existing assumptions about data availability, quality, reuse, and governance. PDEs are no longer static infrastructures – they are living systems, with the above being now not only mere components but active actors who shape these systems.

In this study, we:

  • theorize PDEs as multi-generational, evolving socio-technical systems, shaped by institutional, technological, and contextual dynamics;
  • refine the Evolutionary Model of PDEs (EMPDE) using empirical evidence from five European countries;
  • introduce new attributes that capture overlooked dynamics and emerging realities;
  • describe the rise of a sixth, forward-looking generation propelled by emerging technologies—including AI, LLMs, and other data-driven innovations;
  • propose a research agenda with 17 directions to guide the development of sustainable, resilient, and intelligent PDEs.

Rather than validating the original EMPDE model that we proposed earlier (see this and this pieces), we treated it as a heuristic tool—an analytical lens—to explore how PDEs actually evolve in practice. This approach allowed us to identify theoretical gaps, generational ambiguities, and emerging patterns that refine the model’s structure. This helped us to reveal several important shifts:

  • PDE evolution is not strictly linear; some countries move fluidly across “generations”;
  • emerging technologies are reshaping governance logics faster than institutions can adapt;
  • new attributes—such as ecosystem intelligence, risk-mediated openness, or cross-domain interoperability—are now essential;
  • the sixth generation represents a paradigm shift, in which AI not only consumes data but co-determines which data becomes valuable, usable, and governable.

Understanding PDEs as evolving systems has implications for:

  • policy makers, who must govern increasingly complex data landscapes;
  • public sector organizations, whose operations increasingly depend on cross-domain data flows;
  • researchers, who need frameworks that capture temporal, socio-technical, and institutional dynamics;
  • technology developers, who must navigate the interplay between AI capabilities and data governance constraints.

The refined EMPDE model and the proposed research agenda aim to support these communities in building sustainable, resilient, and intelligent data ecosystems—ones capable of adapting to rapid technological and societal change.

This paper is the result of a our -now already long enough- collaboration with Martin Lněnička, Mariusz Luterek, Petar Milic, and Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar. Special thanks to Marijn Janssen, whose editorial guidance and sharp comments significantly improved the paper.

And sincere thanks to Aleksi Aaltonen and Marta Stelmaszak Rosa, whose invitation to write the Data Studies blogpost provided the unexpected inspiration to finalize this study.

Read more

If you’re interested in PDEs, data governance, AI, or socio-technical systems, I’d love to hear your thoughts. This area is evolving quickly—and so are the ecosystems we rely on.

HICSS2026 Sustainable and Trustworthy Digital and Data Ecosystems for Societal Transformation mini-track


Are you researching sustainable and trustworthy digital ecosystems? Then, submit your work to our HICSS2026 “Sustainable and Trustworthy Digital and Data Ecosystems for Societal Transformation” mini-track we chair together with Daniel Staegemann and Asif Gill at the Association for Information Systems Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-59)!

In an era where data is the foundation of digital transformation, well-designed and managed sustainable and trustworthy digital and data ecosystems are critical for artificial intelligence (AI), strategic innovation, governance, competitive advantage, and trust in increasingly digital societies. With the rise of new data architectures (e.g., data meshes and data lakehouses), the shift from centralized to decentralized systems, and the integration of AI in data governance and management among others emerging technologies (e.g., blockchain, cloud computing), these ecosystems are becoming more dynamic, interconnected, and complex. However, alongside their potential benefits that is a common focus of the research around these ecosystems, challenges related to trustworthiness, transparency, security, sustainability, and governance must be addressed.

HICSS2026 “Sustainable and Trustworthy Digital and Data Ecosystems for Societal Transformation” mini-track we chair together with Daniel Staegemann and Asif Gill invites research on how digital and data ecosystems evolve in terms of resilience, trustworthiness, and sustainability while enabling strategic innovation and societal transformation. We welcome studies that explore the interplay between AI, data governance, policies, methodologies, human factors, and digital transformation across sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and education.
We seek theoretical, empirical, design science, case study, and interdisciplinary contributions on topics including, but not limited to:

  1. AI, trustworthiness, and governance in digital and data ecosystems:
    • AI as an actor and stakeholder in data ecosystems;
    • AI-augmented governance, security, and data quality management;
    • human factors in AI-integrated ecosystems (trust, user acceptance, participation);
    • interoperability, observability, and data linking across ecosystems;
  2. Emerging technologies and strategic innovation:
    • transition from centralized to decentralized data architectures (e.g., data lakehouses, data meshes);
    • emerging technologies for trustworthy ecosystems;
    • AI-driven business process augmentation and decision-making;
    • industry and government case studies on evolving data ecosystems;
  3. Resilience and sustainability of data ecosystems:
    • ethical AI and responsible innovation in data ecosystems;
    • sustainability and long-term governance of digital and data infrastructures;
    • cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary approaches for building sustainable ecosystems;
    • impact of data democratization on digital transformation and innovation.

By combining the strengths of strategic innovation, trustworthy AI, and data ecosystem governance, this track expects to offer a holistic perspective at the intersection of information systems, AI governance, data science, and digital transformation. It will serve as a platform for researchers and practitioners to explore how digital and data ecosystems can be sustainable, resilient, and trustworthy while driving innovation and societal transformation.

We welcome conceptual, empirical, design science, case study, and theoretical papers from fields such as information systems, computer science, data science, management and process science, policy-making, behavioral economics, and social sciences.

This mini-track is part of HICSS59 “Organizational Systems and Technology” track (chairs: Hugh Watson and Dorothy Leidner) and more information about it can be found here.

45th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2024)

As the year comes to an end, so does the 45th edition of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2024) —a conference filled with presentations, countless chats with old colleagues and friends and meeting new ones, and a tons of emotions coming from a warm Bangkok 🇹🇭

This year the conference held under theme “Digital Platforms for Emerging Societies” aimed at examining the expansive role of information technology in driving economic and societal transformation across the globe. Over 1.7K participants from 49 countries attended ICIS2024 this year, incl. Estonia 🇪🇪 – the only country of the Baltics – represented by both TalTech (Tallinn University of Technology) and finally University of Tartu (with me trying to bring the name of Latvia 🇱🇻 as well), in total accounting only three people – Mari-Klara Stein, myself and my PhD student – Dimitris Symeonidis, which is, however, a significant increase compared to previous editions, which is smth we – Mari-Klara and myself – are still not too happy about, as we still remain “rarities,” as I’ve been called several times, and will try to change that 👩‍🔬

The conference started for me with pre-ICIS Symposium SIGDSA (Special Interest Group on Decision Support and Analytics), which this year run under the “Emerging AI Platforms for Societal Good” theme, which was an action-packed day featuring a keynote by Apirak Kosayodhin (Former Governor of Bangkok), followed by a panel on the role of AI across society, business & academia, with Ofir T., discussing whether Artificial Intelligence, and GenAI in particular, is a “friend or foe” reflecting on our evolving attitudes toward it (through the lenses of other phenomenon, incl. dogs & how our attitudes towards them changed over centuries), Borworn Papasratorn addressing challenges of diffusing & adopting AI in Thai Higher Education Institutions, Kriengkrai Boonlert-U-Thai discussing the role of information technology in driving economic & societal transformation, moderated by Ramesh Sharda.

And as a follow-up to this, the paper of my former master student Jan-Erik Kalmus – “Generative AI adoption in higher education: exploring educator resistance in Estonian universities” was presented. In this study, Jan-Erik examined educator resistance to student use of GenAI in higher education focusing on Estonia, known as a “digital nation”, employing a theoretical model informed by the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) that we introduced in previous study presented at ECAI (on which I posted earlier).

It was continued with 7 hours of vibrant dialogue on digital government research as part of the pre-ICIS workshop on eGovernment, including:
✅the first ever study results of my 1st year PhD student – Dimitris Symeonidis – presented (“Reimagining Digital Government: a step towards Blockchain-Enabled Public Data Ecosystems”)
✅a concept of what we call Data Satellites introduced by Asif Gill as part of our “Towards a Data Satellite Architecture for Digital Government Ecosystems” study, in which we call for a data observability level missing in the current data ecosystems, thereby providing zero opportunities to get rid off or at least be informed about dark and toxic data (while the concept name might evolve based on community feedback, whereas happy that the concept itself found an acceptance with community, what we hoped for)
✅and 5 more super interesting studies by colleagues exploring digital transformation, AI in public administration (incl. framework to determine when AI is truly needed (i.e., smth close to the idea of automation as a default and the only in business process redesign – just don’t!), AI literacy, GenAI for citizen engagement), smart cities, and a methodological proposal for a soft digital ecosystem methodology for hybrid cities’ problem design
🎙️all of this masterfully moderated by Rony Medaglia – president of the current SIG-eGov, and tons of discussions around every study and the filed in general, incl. the future plans.

Finally, my first-year PhD student introduced himself to the IS community at probably the most prestigious IS conference, with yet another paper presented at the SIG SVC – AIS Special Interest Group for Services Workshop on Synergizing Service Ecosystems – “Integrating Generative AI with Public Data Ecosystems: Enhancing Decision Making and Efficiency in the Service Industry of the Private Sector”.

All in all, with four papers presented at three ICIS workshops & symposium, this was a very rich week, for which – a heartfelt thanks to the organizers!